Skip to main content

Which educational reforms make sense

We have two sets of primary and secondary schools in this country. One set of schools lies in wealthy areas in which student achievement is quite high. The other set of schools lies in poor urban areas or extreme isolated rural areas in which poverty is pervasive and student achievement is dismal. We know what to do to improve the quality of education in under performing schools. As a country, we do not have the will to do it. There are several reforms that will make education so much better for those in poverty.

Increase Early Childhood Education
The Chicago economist, James Heckman, Nobel prize economist, analyzed data from Michigan and North Carolina going back several decades and found that no other infusion of public dollars came close to matching the rate of return of high-quality early childhood education. Heckman's studies in both the Michigan (the Perry Preschool Study) and North Carolina (the Abecedarian preschool program) studies concluded that there were significant health benefits, increased employment and increased education among young children studied over their lifetime.

Develop the Whole Child
The current clamoring to focus on cognitive skills is absurd. There is ample evidence that a more holistic education approach pays big dividends. One study, a 2016 study at the University of Southern California’s Brain and Creativity Institute, found that musical experiences in childhood can actually accelerate brain development, particularly in the areas of language acquisition and reading skills.  "Music ignites all areas of child development and skills for school readiness: intellectual, social and emotional, motor, language, and overall literacy. It helps the body and the mind work together" (Bright Horizons). Yet what has happened to musical programs in schools since the adoption of No Child Left Behind and its successor programs? Schools focus only on cognitive skills and have eliminated music programs.

There are several studies that demonstrate a link between arts education and academic achievement. It is a story similar to the effect music education has on academic achievement. James Catterall among others has studied the link between arts education and academic achievement for low-income students. He found that low-income and ELL (English Language Learners) students do better in arts-rich rather than arts-poor schools. Ample evidence exists for a far more holistic approach that includes music an arts programs as a vital part of a young person's education.

Vocational Education & Links to Industry
There were many absurdities to the federal law, No Child Left Behind, and its successors but the worst was that all children needed to be college ready. Whatever happened with working with our hands? As a public servant working in city and state government and later as a university professor, I can attest that my electrician made more money than I did. No matter how technology changes, we will always need electricians, woodworkers, plumbers, etc. When our country started replacing shop classes with computer labs, we started down a very foolish road. This does not mean we should ignore the new technologies but we can incorporate new technologies into close ties with the vocational world and link our schools to industries that hire our graduates. This is one strategy that Mayor Bloomberg adoped. He greatly increased the number of technical high schools and linked these schools to industry.

Lessen Testing Requirements
There is ample evidence that emphasis on testing simply means that teachers and administrators focus on constant drilling and less teaching and learning. However, the evidence is ignored. I will leave you with just one website that explains testing. However, what the emphasis on testing in our schools does do is ignore all the other skills are students need - social and emotional, motor, language, and my favorite, music and art. More on testing in another blog.

Understand the Effects of Poverty on Children
I don't think Americans appreciate how poverty affects learning. Part of this ignorance is because those who now control educational policy reform in this country are not from the education world but rather from the private sector. These business leaders are ignorant of child development theories, do not travel in the educational world and are not exposed to educational theories about the basic concepts of child development, and they tend to hire whiz kids from the "best" colleges who have no understanding of how children learn, let alone children in poverty. I once talked to an educational policy analyst for the Bloomberg administration who would not dream of reading an education journal. She did, however, read the Harvard Business Review. If you wish to understand how poverty affects learning, read the article, "How Poverty Affects Classroom Engagement," in Educational Leadership or read the "Long Term Cognitive and Academic Effects of Early Childhood Education on Children in Poverty" in Preventive Medicine. Although I myself read the Harvard Business Review, I also read education journals that have the latest in child development theories. Also read Cantor on poverty and trauma. .

If we were simply to make these changes in our schools: increase preschool education, develop holistic education, lessen testing requirements, and expand vocational education and provide more links to industry, we would see improvements in under performing schools. If we were to reduce poverty, we would see massive positive changes in our schools.


Popular posts from this blog

Why I LIke Mike Bloomberg by Lynne Weikart

Bloomberg took office two months after 9/11. The results of 9/11 - the city lost over 100,000 private sector jobs in one year. The city was devastated. Corporations were fleeing the city as were residents. Bloomberg created an economic development machine that roared through all five boroughs and brought over 400,000 new jobs.    Just about the time the city recovered from 9/11, there was a national recession and Bloomberg guided the recovery. That recovery was cushioned by the fact that Bloomberg had raised taxes twice and the city had surpluses to help navigate the recession. Very early in his mayoralty, Bloomberg made it very clear that he would not tolerate discrimination against Muslims. In 2002 shortly after Bloomberg became mayor, he announced he was against a city council bill that would ban the Palestine Authority from their offices in the city. A few years later in the hysteria surrounding the proposed building of an Islamic Community Center a few blocks from the deva

Federal Abandonment of Public Housing

Public housing began during the Roosevelt years. In 1937 President Franklin Roosevelt signed the United States Housing Act, known as Wagner-Steagall, to support building low-rent public housing. In the wake of  President Truman‘s surprise reelection in 1948, Congress passed the bill now known as the Housing Act of 1949 and re-authorized the public housing program. The GI Bill after World War II supported veterans in securing low-interest loans to own their own homes. In the 1950s Congress passed a second Housing Act focused on conserving and rehabilitating low-income housing. All these laws favored white people. The 1950s were famous for "urban renewal" which meant that the federal government provided grants for slum clearance that often meant cities would choose the poorest section of town to abolish residences and build new construction.  In the 1960s, public housing became less discriminatory with Kennedy's Equal Opportunity in Housing Act. President Johnson eleva

Federal Government and the Lack of Affordable Housing

The federal government hasn't built public housing since the 1960s. President Johnson pushed Congress to pass the 1968 Housing Act that became a major time of construction of public housing almost doubling such units across the country. In addition, Bobby Kennedy and Senator Jacob Javits pushed through a 1966 amendment to the Economic Development Act that provided private developers with incentives payments to invest in poverty areas.   Once the Reagan era began that was the end of public housing. Instead, Reagan signed the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which slowed building of low-income housing further. First, the act repealed accelerated depreciation and the use of depreciation deductions to offset other ordinary income, precipitating a sharp drop in multifamily housing production. Second, the law placed a cap, for the first time, on states’ authority to issue tax-exempt bonds for multifamily housing and imposed income limits on eligible households. Third, the act created the Low In